The Star Tribune reported over the weekend that emergency response fees have recently emerged on several city council agendas. Emergency response fees, assessed for things such as fire protection or car accidents that require paramedic services, would help some cities maintain the level and quality of essential services in light of possible LGA cuts. At the same time, however, these fees may discourage citizens in emergency situations from calling for help.
On a public policy level, emergency response fees will increase the disparities that exist amongst cities and their residents, and the extra costs will make some cities less attractive places to live or do business than others. Reducing these disparities is why the LGA program was created in the first place. No matter what corner of the state you live in, you have a right to essential services at an affordable price. Implementing emergency response fees haphazardly across the state is a clear indicator that reducing LGA will create losers and winners when it comes to quality of life services.
If you believe that emergency response fees will take our cities in the wrong direction, contact the governor and your legislators. Tell them that cities need LGA to ensure all residents receive essential services at an affordable price.